Legal Opinion

Carr v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 21, 1999No. 1 CA-IC 99-0002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

¶ 1 This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission award that denied travel reimbursement to the claimant and established an average monthly wage. We set the award aside because we conclude that the injured worker, who was required to travel outside his community to obtain treatment, is entitled to be paid travel expenses.

¶2 In 1997 the claimant was hired by Indiana Western Express as an over-the-road truck driver out of its Kingman truck terminal. He lived about sixteen miles outside of Seligman, Arizona, and to reach King-man he had to drive for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matlock v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Moorehead v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Wiedmaier v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Harvey Auto Supply Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Drew v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  2. Carlos D. Silveti v. Ohio Valley Nursing Home, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Carlos D. Silveti v. Ohio Valley Nursing Home, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. City of Flagstaff v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. Gonzalez v. interstate/xl SpecialtyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API