Padilla v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.
Petitioner, Maria Padilla, suffered an industrial injury on May 13, 1973. She was married and although she helped to support her family, the Commission declined to award her an additional allowance of $10.-00 per month for dependents as set forth in A.R.S. § 23-1045(A) (2). The Court of Appeals set aside the award. We accepted review. Opinion of the Court of Appeals, 24 Ariz.App. 42, 535 P.2d 634, vacated and the award of the Industrial Commission affirmed.
The facts are not in dispute. At the time of her injury, petitioner was married and had three minor…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Padilla v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
3Cited by34 opinions
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Jim's Water Service v. EayrsWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Busk v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. (In Re Amazon.com, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Bowslaugh v. BowslaughArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Ross v. NanceArizona Supreme Court · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.