Legal Opinion

Padilla v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1976No. 12184-PRPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

Petitioner, Maria Padilla, suffered an industrial injury on May 13, 1973. She was married and although she helped to support her family, the Commission declined to award her an additional allowance of $10.-00 per month for dependents as set forth in A.R.S. § 23-1045(A) (2). The Court of Appeals set aside the award. We accepted review. Opinion of the Court of Appeals, 24 Ariz.App. 42, 535 P.2d 634, vacated and the award of the Industrial Commission affirmed.

The facts are not in dispute. At the time of her injury, petitioner was married and had three minor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Padilla v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Jim's Water Service v. EayrsWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Busk v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. (In Re Amazon.com, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. Bowslaugh v. BowslaughArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Ross v. NanceArizona Supreme Court · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API