Legal Opinion

Breitenbach v. N.B. Handy Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 8, 2001No. 28, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The question this case presents is whether a workers’ compensation claimant, who has been injured in the course of employment and is receiving medical treatment pursuant to an award by the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Commission (the “Commission”), is entitled to reimbursement for the cost of transportation to and from the treating health care provider. We shall answer that question in the affirmative.

William B. Breitenbach, the appellant, filed a workers’ compensation claim that the N.B. Handy Company and American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, the employer and…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Sullins v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Mayor & City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Montgomery County v. DeiblerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Board of Education v. Marks-SloanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Johnson v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Walker v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API