Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Trillium Staffing
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 2017No. A16-2017PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice.
This case requires us to determine whether the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) erred in granting respondent Eddie Hudson’s petition to vacate an award of workers’ compensation benefits. Hudson, who was injured while working for Trillium Staffing, filed a workers’ compensation claim that the parties later settled. About a year after the settlement, Hudson filed a petition to vacate the award with the WCCA, which granted Hudson’s petition on the ground that his medical condition had substantially *538changed in a way that clearly was not, and could not reasonably…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Mattson v. AbateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Allan v. R.D. Offutt Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Ellen Gianotti v. Independent School District 152 and RAM Mutual Insurance Co., Relators, and Sanford Health, Essentia Health Systems, Injured Workers Pharmacy, and Onword Therapy, Intervenors.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. Carver Cnty.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Alby v. BNSF Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- Mattick v. Hy-Vee Foods StoresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Bobby Lykins, by George Duranske, conservator, Respondent, vs. Anderson Contracting, Inc., and SFM Mutual Insurance Co.,...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
- Rodney Dean Bjornson, Relator, vs. McNeilus Companies, Inc. and Travelers Indemnity Company of America and Property & ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025