Alby v. BNSF Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtSchellhas, Judge
Following a jury verdict in this case arising under the Federal Employers Liability Act, appellant challenges the district court's grant of judgment as a matter of law to respondent and argues that the *565court erred in applying the federal postjudgment interest rate. Respondent challenges the court's denial of its motion for a new trial. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
Respondent BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) employed appellant James Alby for approximately 20 years as a conductor and engineer. In January 2014, Alby experienced back pain and could not move. Alby's treating orthopedic…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Iota Phi Lambda Sorority, Inc. v. Contenta Global Capital Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019