Legal Opinion

Alby v. BNSF Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 2018No. A17-1242PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchellhas, Judge

Following a jury verdict in this case arising under the Federal Employers Liability Act, appellant challenges the district court's grant of judgment as a matter of law to respondent and argues that the *565court erred in applying the federal postjudgment interest rate. Respondent challenges the court's denial of its motion for a new trial. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Respondent BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) employed appellant James Alby for approximately 20 years as a conductor and engineer. In January 2014, Alby experienced back pain and could not move. Alby's treating orthopedic…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Iota Phi Lambda Sorority, Inc. v. Contenta Global Capital Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API