Legal Opinion

Rodney Dean Bjornson, Relator, vs. McNeilus Companies, Inc. and Travelers Indemnity Company of America and Property & ...

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 2025No. A240454Published

The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals must assess whether there is evidence in the record that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a compensation judge’s determination that an employee’s attorney recovered an ascertainable dollar amount of medical benefits under Minn. Stat. § 176.081, subd. 1(a) (2024). Reversed and remanded. Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A24-0454 Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals Hennesy, J. Rodney Dean Bjornson, Relator, vs. Filed: April 30, 2025 Office of Appellate Courts McNeilus Companies, Inc. and Travelers Indemnity Company of America and Property & Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford with claims administered by Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Respondents. ________________________ David C. Wulff, Law Office of David C. Wulff, New Brighton, Minnesota, for relator. David J. Klaiman, Casey A. Brown, Aafedt, Forde, Gray, Monson & Hager, PA, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Roraff v. State, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Hudson v. Trillium StaffingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API