Legal Opinion

Mattick v. Hy-Vee Foods Stores

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 2017No. A16-1802PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MCKEIG, Justice.

This case requires us to determine whether the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) exceeded the scope of its review when it reversed the compensation judge’s decision to deny benefits to respondent-employee Debra K. Mattick. Because the compensation judge’s decision was supported by substantial evidence, we conclude that the WCCA exceeded the scope of its review. Accordingly, we reverse the WCCA’s decision and reinstate the compensation judge’s decision.

FACTS

Mattick has worked as a cake decorator at a Hy-Vee store in Albert Lea since 2001. In 2000, before she…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Schuette v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Dykhoff v. Xcel EnergySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Nord v. City of CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Ellen Gianotti v. Independent School District 152 and RAM Mutual Insurance Co., Relators, and Sanford Health, Essentia Health Systems, Injured Workers Pharmacy, and Onword Therapy, Intervenors.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Carver Cnty.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API