Legal Opinion
In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 1, 2012No. A10-1646PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.
Vernon L.E. Stisser (Stisser), the personal representative of the estate of his late wife, Pamela Andreas Stisser (Pamela), petitioned the Hennepin County District Court for an order directing certain payments and disbursements from Pamela’s inter vivos trust (Trust or Trust Agreement). Among other claims, Stisser sought an order requiring trustee David L. Andreas (Trustee) to (1) pay all debts at the time of Pamela’s death that were secured by Pamela’s personal property and by Pamela’s and Stisser’s real estate; (2) compensate Stisser for his services as the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Trondson v. JanikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- In Re Trust Under Will of HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Distribution of Attorney's Fees Between Stowman Law Firm, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Marine Credit Union v. Detlefson-DelanoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.