Legal Opinion
Eckis v. Linn County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 18, 1991No. 90-132; CA A71734PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s remand of a comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permit granted by Linn County. The county decisions would have allowed petitioners to conduct aggregate extraction and processing operations on a 10-acre site.
Petitioners assign 15 errors, but they entail only two issues that warrant discussion. In their first assignment, petitioners assert that LUBA erred by not striking respondents’ petition for review. LUBA relied on Hilliard v. Lane County Commrs., 51 Or App 587, 595, 626 P2d 905, rev den 291 Or 368 (1981), for the proposition that “LUBA is not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Callan v. Confederation of Oregon School AdministratorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Hilliard v. Lane County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Canfield v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Schatz v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Friends of Bryant Woods Park v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Hallmark Inns & Resorts, Inc. v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Draves v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.