Canfield v. Yamhill County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Respondents Rech and Laridon (respondents) applied for, and Yamhill County approved, conditional use permits for respondents to operate a boarding kennel and home occupation pet grooming facility. Petitioners appealed to LUBA, asserting numerous challenges to the county’s decision. LUBA rejected all but one of petitioners’ contentions but remanded on the basis of that contention for the county to make further findings and to determine whether the proposed use complies with the requirement of the county zoning ordinance that a “home occupation shall not generate traffic or parking beyond what…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Weeks v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Eckis v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Friends of Bryant Woods Park v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Oregon State Parks & Recreation v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gould v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Alliance for Responsible Land Use v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Baker v. City of WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Opp v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- ALL. FOR RES. LAND USE v. Deschutes Cty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.