Schatz v. City of Jacksonville
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Petitioners seek review of, and the city of Jacksonville cross-petitions from, LUBA’s remand of the city’s denial of petitioners’ tentative subdivision plat. We affirm.
This is the second time that decisions on the subdivision application have been before LUBA and us. In the earlier appeal, LUBA remanded the city’s approval of the tentative plat. Cecil v. City of Jacksonville, 19 Or LUBA 446, aff'd 104 Or App 526, 800 P2d 1090 (1990), rev den 311 Or 166 (1991). The city had concluded that the subdivision proposal complied with applicable provisions of its comprehensive plan and land use…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beck v. City of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Foland v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Mill Creek Glen Protection Ass'n v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Collins v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Gordon v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Larson v. Wallowa CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Columbia Riverkeeper v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Hendgen v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- McKay Creek Valley Ass'n v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Columbia Riverkeeper v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.