Legal Opinion

Seattle Lumber Co. v. Richardson & Elmer Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1912No. 10043PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered June 17, 1911, upon findings in favor of certain lien claimants, in an action to foreclose mechanics’ liens.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment in an action brought by the Seattle Lumber Company against Barnes & Hester, contractors, and Dunn and wife, as owners, in which it was sought to foreclose a hen for material used in the construction of the building upon the described premises. Richardson & Elmer Company and W. P. Fuller & Company, being lien claimants for material furnished, were made defendants. The judgment denies the right of lien to the Seattle Lumber Company, from which it appeals. The other liens are established, from which the Dunns appeal.

The only question involved in the appeals is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heim v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Finlay v. TagholmWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Finlay v. TagholmWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Hewitt Lea Lumber Co. v. SandellWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Converse v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. CHG International, Inc. v. Platt Electric Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. Cascade Lumber & Shingle Co. v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. DKS Construction Management, Inc. v. Real Estate Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API