Heim v. Elliott
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered February 15, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to foreclose mechanics’ liens.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
The appellants, as the owners of two lots in the city of Seattle, on September 3, 1909, entered into a contract with the respondent Martin, hereafter called the contractor, whereby the latter agreed to furnish all the labor and material and erect a dwelling house on the lots, for a stipulated price. The respondent Wilkinson thereafter, in pursuance of an agreement with the contractor, furnished the material for and installed and finished the hard wood floors. The contract price therefor was $194. Thereafter, at the contractor’s request, Wilkinson did extra work of the value of $15.50. No…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crane Co. v. Pacific Heat & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
- Merchants Insurance v. HerberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Hunnicutt & Bellingrath Co. v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Barbee v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Finlay v. TagholmWashington Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by13 opinions
- Main Bank of Chicago v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Sioux City Foundry & Manufacturing Co. v. MertenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Hallett v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Brower Co. v. Noise Control of Seattle, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.