Legal Opinion
Hewitt Lea Lumber Co. v. Sandell
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1912No. 10050PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county,, Tallman, J., entered April 25, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
On April 7, 1910, appellants Sandell and one Holden executed a contract covering certain lots in the city of Seattle. The terms of the contract material to our present inquiry are as follows:
“I have this day leased to D. N. Holden for a term of five years from this date the northeast corner of Park Ave. and Navy Yard Ave., technically described as the east twenty feet of lots seventeen block sixteen, East Seattle, King County, Washington, rent to be paid every six months; said rental is twenty-five dollars per year from date, and I further agree to sell to said D. N. Holden, at any time…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heim v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Finlay v. TagholmWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Finlay v. TagholmWashington Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- Colby & Dickinson, Inc. v. McCullochWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Seattle Lumber Co. v. Richardson & Elmer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912