Finlay v. Tagholm
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered April 18, 1910, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a materialman’s lien.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
The Ballard Lumber Company, on the 28th and 31st days of July 1909, furnished lumber of the value of $137.83 to Tagholm & Jensen, contractors, who were at that time engaged in building a dwelling house for respondent Nelson. The lower court found, that the material was actually used in the construction of the building; that it was of the reasonable value of $137.83; and further, “that at the time such materials were delivered to be used in the construction of said building, the Ballard Lumber Company did not deliver or mail to the owners or any one of them a duplicate statement of all such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spokane Grain & Fuel Co. v. LyttakerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Cascade Lumber Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Strandell v. MoranWashington Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rieflin v. GraftonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Boise-Payette Lumber Co. v. Dominican Sisters of Ontario & German American Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Auld v. StarbardOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Finlay v. TagholmWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Walker v. LanningWashington Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.