Finlay v. Tagholm
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal by cross-complainant from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered April 18, 1910, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a materialman’s lien.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
The appellant, W. P. Fuller & Company, a corporation, by this appeal seeks to have a lien declared against the property of the respondents Tagholm, Jensen, and Nelson, for the sum of $2,184.54, with interest and costs. The trial court decreed it a lien to the extent of $112.40 for extras, but denied the lien for the larger amount. The court found that, on the 21st day of April, 1909, the appellant entered into an agreement with Noyes & Dutton, who had a contract with the respondents for the construction of a building on their property, to furnish certain material to the contractors to be used…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. Amarillo Improvement Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
- Finlay v. TagholmWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Breneman v. Beaumont Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baker v. Yakima Valley Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Rieflin v. GraftonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Neary v. Puget Sound Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
- Hallett v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Heim v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.