Legal Opinion

State v. Morrow

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 1928No. 26,949PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This appeal from a judgment of conviction presents questions Avhich go only to the validity of the ordinance under which defendant was prosecuted. It prohibits the operation in Minneapolis of any “open air motor vehicle parking place” where ten or more motor vehicles may be or are parked for hire unless a license is first procured from the city council. The annual fee for such a license is $10. The ordinance does not make any essentials of person or place prerequisite to a license. Violations are punishable by a fine not exceeding $100 or by imprisonment of not more than 90 days.

The objection…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. State v. DirnbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Crescent Oil Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. State v. RosensteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Montgomery Citizens League v. GreenhalghCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. City of Duluth v. CervenySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Blumenthal v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Sverkerson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API