State v. Rosenstein
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was charged with the violation of a city ordinance, tried in the municipal court of Minneapolis before Baldwin, J., and found guilty and ordered to pay a fine of $50 or in default thereof be imprisoned in the work house for a term not exceeding 50 days. From an order denying his motion for a new trial., defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis of the violation of a city ordinance and appealed from an order denying a new trial.
The material portion of the ordinance charged to have been.violated, adopted by the city council on March 14, 1916, provides in substance as follows:
Section 1. No person shall hereafter install or open any lumber-yard or erect any building for the sale or storage of lumber within the city of Minneapolis without the consent of the city council.
Subsequent sections provide for the issuance of permits on application to the city council.
It…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Evison v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- State v. TaubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Bainbridge v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State ex rel. Miller v. ReiterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- State v. WittlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State ex rel. Beery v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State v. MorrowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Marquis v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- City of Juneau v. Badger Co-operative Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.