Legal Opinion
City of Duluth v. Cerveny
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 8, 1944No. 33,852PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Youngdahl, Justice.
On February 10, 1944,.in the municipal court, of Duluth, defendant was convicted of the offense of keeping intoxicating liquor in his possession for the purpose of sale in violation of a city ordinance. He was brought into court on a warrant issued under Minn. St. 1941, § 340.11 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 3200-25). A search warrant was also obtained under § 340.65 (§ 3200-81), pursuant to which defendant’s premises were searched and about 160 cases of intoxicating liquor seized by police officers executing the warrant. Defendant was charged under the ordinance with sale and…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Dodge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Park v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Anderson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Zuber v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- State v. HutchinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.