Legal Opinion
Sverkerson v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 3, 1939No. 31,727PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Losing, Justice.
This was a proceeding in which a declaratory judgment was sought as to the validity of a provision in an ordinance enacted by the city council of Minneapolis. The appeal is from a denial of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. Plaintiff, Carl Sverkerson, is and has been engaged in the fuel business in Minneapolis for about 18 years, conducting it from Ms residence. He owns and operates a truck which he uses to deliver fuel within the city.
As a condition precedent to engaging in the fuel business in Minneapolis, an ordinance, enacted in 1933, requires that a license must be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- State ex rel. Rice v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- State v. DirnbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- State v. SugarmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- State v. MorrowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- The Alexander Co. v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Cyphers v. AllynSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- City of Duluth v. CervenySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.