Legal Opinion
Levi v. Special Indemnity Fund
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 18, 1964No. 39005PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
The trial tribunal’s order under review denies claimant’s motion to reopen the claim on an alleged change of his condition and to allow him additional benefits solely against the Special Indemnity Fund (designated in this opinion as the Fund).
Claimant’s last industrial accident occurred on September 20,1952. An award, made against the employer on February 9, 1953, allowed him 20 per centum permanent (partial) disability to the right leg, or 35 weeks of benefits. On September 12, 1953, claimant secured a separate award against the Fund which recites, inter alia, that (a)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Special Indemnity Fund v. FarmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Cameron & Henderson, Inc. v. FranksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Special Indemnity Fund v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Petroleum Maintenance Co. v. HerronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Special Indemnity Fund v. AcuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Reynolds v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- J. C. Penney Co. v. CrumbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- BALL v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Arduser v. Daniel International Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.