Legal Opinion

Arduser v. Daniel International Corp.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 28, 1982No. 53,043PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Meyer, J.:

In this-workmen’s compensation appeal, we consider a settlement agreement entered into by Dell Henry Arduser (claimant) with Daniel International Corporation (respondent appellee, hereinafter referred to as the employer) and United States Fidelity and Guaranty (employer’s insurance carrier, hereinafter referred to as insurance carrier). At issue herein is whether that settlement agreement (admittedly for a sum far less than that to which claimant would otherwise be entitled) precludes claimant from now pursuing or continuing an action against appellee Kansas Workmen’s Compensation…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Easom v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Madison v. Key Work Clothes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Lakeview Gardens, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. SchneiderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. White v. Weinberger Builders, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. Mayes v. Second Injury FundIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. SleethCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
  4. Alvin G. Rhodes Pump Sales v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API