Legal Opinion
Special Indemnity Fund v. Davidson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 6, 1945No. 31936PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HURST, V. C. J.
This is an original proceeding brought by the Special Indemnity Fund, to review an award made to Homer Davidson, respondent. Armour and Company is joined as respondent herein for the reason that the award is a joint award under the provisions of the 1943 Act, S. L. 1943, page 258, 85 O. S. 1943 Supp. §§ 171-176.
On March 3, 1933, the respondent sustained an accidental injury to his right thumb, which the State Industrial Commission found resulted in a 20 per cent permanent disability to said thumb and awarded 12 weeks compensation therefor. That compensation has been satisfied,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Protho v. NetteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Nease v. Hughes Stone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Special Indemnity Fund v. FarmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
3Cited by26 opinions
- Special Indemnity Fund v. FigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Fehring v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Forston v. HeislerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Levi v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Special Indemnity Fund v. BonnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.