Legal Opinion
Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. Wade
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 26, 2008No. 103,067PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
11 The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether claimant timely requested a hearing on his right to receive benefits from the Multiple Injury Trust Fund (Fund). We conclude that 85 O0.S8.S8upp.1986, § 48 (B) governs the time-restriction issue and that this statute required claimant to file a request for a hearing on his claim against the Fund within five years from the last payment by the employer in the primary claim. In *1207this case, the date of last payment by the employer is a fact to be found by the trial judge below. Accordingly, we vacate the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- McNeill v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Reynolds v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Cole v. Silverado Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- BALL v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Consolidated Grain & Barge Co. v. Structural Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- W.R. Allison Enterprises, Inc. v. CompSource OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. MACKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.