Legal Opinion

McAllister v. California Coastal Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 2008No. H031283PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUSHING, P. J.

I. Introduction

This appeal represents the latest skirmish in Dr. Hugh McAllister’s battle to stop Sheldon J. Laube and Dr. Nancy J. Engel (Laube and Engel) from building a home on neighboring property visible from his home. Laube and Engel sought a coastal development permit, and the California Coastal Commission (the Commission) granted it. Dr. McAllister now challenges that decision.

The appeal raises myriad issues, one of which implicates two coastal development policies. One policy protects environmentally sensitive habitat areas—in this case, habitat for the Smith’s…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Schafer v. City of Los Angeles CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Hines v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Ross v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Cummings v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Wollmer v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API