Legal Opinion
Ross v. California Coastal Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 9, 2011No. B225796PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
A governmental entity with beachfront property within its borders must adopt a local coastal program. A local coastal program or any amendments thereto are subject to approval by the California Coastal Commission (the commission). Public Resources Code section 21080.5, subdivision (a), which is part of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.), permits the Secretary of the Resources Agency (the secretary) to certify an administrative agency’s regulatory program. The secretary’s certification extends to the preparation of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Sierra Club v. State Board of ForestryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hoitt v. Department of RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Hagopian v. St. of CACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Bay Area Citizens v. Association of Bay Area GovernmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- In re Acknowledgment CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- W.M. Barr & Co. v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.