Legal Opinion

Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictis

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 9, 1987No. 85-1092PublishedCited by 990 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

In Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U. S. 393 (1922), the Court reviewed the constitutionality of a Pennsylvania statute that admittedly destroyed “previously existing rights of property and contract.” Id., at 413. Writing for the Court, Justice Holmes explained:

“Government hardly could go on if to some extent values incident to property could not be diminished without paying for every such change in the general law. As long recognized, some values are enjoyed under an implied limitation and must yield to the police power. But obviously the implied limitation must have its limits, or the…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by990 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

985 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API