Legal Opinion
Wollmer v. City of Berkeley
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 2011No. A128121PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
Appellant Stephen Wollmer asks this court to reverse the denial of his petition for administrative mandamus challenging two approvals by respondents City of Berkeley and the Berkeley City Council (collectively, the City) for a mixed-use affordable housing or senior affordable housing project located at 1200 Ashby Avenue.1 Specifically, he denounces the approvals as violative of the state’s density bonus law as well as the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).2 We conclude the trial court properly denied the petition and entered judgment in favor of the City;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. Main San Gabriel Basin WatermasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- McAllister v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Friends of Lagoon Valley v. City of VacavilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Robinson v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Kirola v. City of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v. State Ex Rel. 14th District Agricultural Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Serna v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.