Legal Opinion
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v. State Ex Rel. 14th District Agricultural Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 23, 2015No. C070836APublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MURRAY, J.
The trial court denied a petition for writ of mandate and complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief filed by appellants Citizens for Environmental Responsibility, Stop The Rodeo, and Eric Zamost, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) Appellants claim the 14th District Agricultural Association and its board of directors (collectively District) violated CEQA by approving a notice of exemption (NOE) from environmental review for a rodeo held by real party in interest Stars of Justice, Inc., at the Santa Cruz County…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Neighbours v. Buzz Oates EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. Main San Gabriel Basin WatermasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Young v. City of CoronadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Don't Cell Our Parks v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Walters v. City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Anderson v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Buena Vista Wat. Storage Dist. v. Kern Wat. Bank AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.