Legal Opinion
Robinson v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 20, 2012No. A132385PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, P. J.
This appeal arises from the denial of a petition for writ of mandate (writ petition) brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) The writ petition sought to overturn the decision of respondent City and County of San Francisco (the City) to permit real parties in interest and respondents T-Mobile West Corporation, T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile Resources Corporation, and Omnipoint Communications, Inc. (collectively T-Mobile), to place sets of wireless telecommunications equipment on existing utility poles, including a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Ass'n for Protection of Environmental Values v. City of UkiahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Community Youth Athletic Center v. City of National CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Don't Cell Our Parks v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Aptos Residents Ass'n v. Cnty. of Santa Cruz, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Aptos Residents Assoc. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Arcadians for Environmental Preservation v. City of ArcadiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.