Legal Opinion

Kirola v. City of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 26, 2014No. Case No: C 07-3685 SBAPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLASS ACTION

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Ivana Kirola (“Kirola” or “Plaintiff’), a mobility-impaired individual, brings the instant disability access class action on behalf of herself and similarly-situated individuals against Defendants City and County of San Francisco, the Mayor of San Francisco, and members of the Board of Supervisors (collectively “the City”). She alleges that the City discriminates against mobility-impaired persons by failing to eliminate all access barriers from or otherwise ensure…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cranpark, Inc. v. Rogers Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. Ivana Kirola v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Crandall v. Starbucks Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  4. Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. California Foundation for Independent Living Centers v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API