Legal Opinion

Fleming v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1952No. L. A. 21916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The Board of Governors of The State Bar adopted the recommendation of the local administrative committee that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years because of unprofessional conduct, moral turpitude and dishonesty in connection with a guardianship matter. Petitioner seeks review of the board’s decision. The proceeding presents no question of law, but only the question whether, after weighing the evidence, we should follow the board’s recommendation.

We have examined the entire record in the light of the established rules that the findings and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Furman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. In Re ZanettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Boyer v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Butler v. GoslingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Magee v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Marlowe v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Burns v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API