Legal Opinion

Burns v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1955No. S. F. 19242PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

— In response to a writ of review, the Board of Governors of The State Bar has presented the record of the proceeding which is the basis of its recommendation that Emmett R. Burns be disciplined by suspension from the practice of law for six months.

The charges of professional misconduct grow out of Burns’ representation of John H. Crumley in a personal injury action. Crumley engaged as his attorney one Sibbett, who negotiated a settlement. Crumley rejected it and employed Burns, who agreed with Sibbett to divide equally with him *298the amount of the contingent fee after deduction of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Fish v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Peck v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Fall v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Stanford v. the State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Fitzpatrick v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Silver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. In Re AlkowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API