Basik v. General Motors Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
The sole question presented in this appeal is whether plaintiffs, during the period from July 1, 1940, to June 10, 1942, inclusive, were engaged in the “production of goods for commerce” as those words are used in the fair labor standards act of 1938 (29 IJSCA, §§ 201-219), so as to entitle them to the overtime pay benefits provided in the act.
Plaintiff Steve Basik and others were employed in the Fleetwood, Ternstedt' and Fisher plants of defendant General Motors Corporation, where goods were produced for commerce during the period mentioned. As cooks, wagon attendants, truck drivers, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walton v. Southern Package Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
- McComb v. Factory Stores Co. of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1948
- Waialua Agr. Co. v. ManejaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1951
- Tipton v. Bearl Sprott Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Hawkins v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.