Legal Opinion

Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided November 21, 1945No. 131PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVEN, District Judge.

Case under Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., involving questions relating to statute of limitations, “engaged in commerce”, interstate shipments coming to “rest”, a “substantial” part of work week, mixture of intrastate and interstate duties, illness, waiver of claim, attorney’s fee and interest. The question of the statute of limitations in the instant case was previously argued at length in connection with the defendant’s motion to strike and for summary judgment. The opinion of this Court in overruling that motion appears in Keen v. Mid-Continent…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. Klinghoffer Bros. Realty Corp., Irving Jacobson and Albert KlinghofferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SoileauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  3. Roland Electrical Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  4. Adams v. Little Missouri Minerals AssociationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Sprung Ex Rel. Sprung v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API