Waialua Agr. Co. v. Maneja
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
METZGER, Chief Judge.
Part I.
Statement and Findings.
I
Nature of Action, Controversy Involved, and Jurisdiction.
This action arises under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, the Act of June 25, 1938, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. Plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment, and the defendants filed a counter-claim under Section 16(b) of the Act to recover unpaid overtime compensation for work performed by them as employees of plaintiff, and to recover liquidated damages, costs and attorneys’ fees.
Following an earlier trial herein, a decision and judgment of this court, reported at 77…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Peña v. Eastern Sugar AssociatesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- Waialua Agricultural Co., Limited v. ManejaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Wyatt v. Holtville Alfalfa Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1952
- Mitchell v. BowmanDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.