Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1951No. 6333PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOPER, Circuit Judge.

The complainants in the District Court brought suit on April 24, 1951 under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1060, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201 to 219, to recover from their employer, E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, Inc. unpaid overtime compensation for services rendered during a period of two years prior to suit. They -claimed that they were required to work for 50 minutes in excess of 40 hours per week, i. e., 10 minutes in excess of 8 hours on each day of the 5-day work week, and that they received no pay for the overtime. They sued for $2106.00 and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Frank v. Wilson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company, Incorporated v. Dennis F. Harrup, Lester Blackmon, Beulah F. Viar, John M. Crowder, Jr., and Charles E. RoanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  2. Mitchell v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Tobin v. Cherry River Boom & Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1952
  4. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Lloyd H. Moore, an Individual D/B/A Garrard MillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  5. Juarez v. Kennecott Copper Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API