Legal Opinion
Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. Hall
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 9, 1942No. 21PublishedCited by 221 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy
We are concerned here, as in Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling, 316 U. S. 517, with a problem of statutory delineation, not *90constitutional power, in the application of the Fair Labor Standards Act1 to a particular situation. This is an action to recover unpaid overtime compensation and an equal amount as liquidated damages, brought by respondent employees under § 16 (b). We must decide whether respondents are engaged “in the production of goods for commerce,” within the meaning of § 7 (a) of the Act. The district court held that they were so engaged, and, since petitioner had failed to compensate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Enterprise Box Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by221 opinions
- D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Urnikis-Negro v. American Family Property ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Mumbower v. CallicottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
216 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.