Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Johnson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1931No. 6,811PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Ralph Hansen and Raymond Shanley, as copartners, have appealed from a judgment in favor of the defendants, J. R. Wine and Charlie Johnson, entered in an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage and to have all claims of the defendants to the property therein described declared junior and subsequent thereto.

The uncontroverted facts are as follows: In April, 1929, the plaintiffs entered into a contract for the sale to Johnson, of certain real property situated in Powell county, wherein all parties to the contract reside. The consideration was $10,000, payable in installments, for the payment of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Merchants' National Bank v. GreenhoodMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Cardenas v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Roman v. AlbertMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Healy v. GinoffMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Reynolds v. FitzpatrickMontana Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roecher v. StoryMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Walker v. MinkMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Lee C. Nelson, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1963
  4. Griffiths v. ThrasherMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. WieckMontana Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API