Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Fitzpatrick

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1899No. 1,098PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from, District Court, Deer Lodge County; Theo. Brcrntby, Judge. Action by J. B. Reynolds against John Fitzpatrick and another, as sheriff and deputy sheriff. From a j udgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

This action is for damages for the conversion of certain personal property by the defendants as sheriff and deputy sheriff of Deer Lodge county.

Plaintiff stated his cause of action in two counts; in the first, after alleging the official capacities of the defendants, he set up that on August 23, 1895, Maddux and Clark executed their promissory note to plaintiff, wherein they promised to pay to him or order $1,300, with interest, and that on the *54same day, to secure the payment of the note, they executed and delivered to plaintiff a chattel mortgage upon certain saloon property. It is alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alford v. . McCormacSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Tuttle v. HardenbergMontana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Swenson v. KleinschmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Baker v. PowerMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Eddy v. KenneyMontana Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Scott v. WaggonerMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Barth v. ElyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Isbell v. SletteMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Interstate National Bank v. McCormickMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Moore v. CrittendenMontana Supreme Court · 1922

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API