Merchants' National Bank v. Greenhood
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from First Judicial District, Lewis and Cla/rke County. Action to have an assignment declared fraudulent. The cause was tried before Hunt and Buck, JJ., sitting concurrently. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff below. Statement of the case by the justice delivering the opinion. The nature of this action will appear fully by the complaint therein, which pleading we have deemed best to insert in this statement in full.
Read the full summary
Appeal from First Judicial District, Lewis and Cla/rke County. Action to have an assignment declared fraudulent. The cause was tried before Hunt and Buck, JJ., sitting concurrently. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff below. Statement of the case by the justice delivering the opinion. The nature of this action will appear fully by the complaint therein, which pleading we have deemed best to insert in this statement in full. After the close of the trial, the court allowed the plaintiff to amend its complaint. The complaint, as finally amended under that order, is as follows: “Now comes the…
1Opinion of the CourtDe Witt, J.
It is not often that as full and elaborate find- . ings of fact are made in a case as those now before us. The trial involved volumes of figures and days of testimony upon questions of fact. The findings treated all these questions of accounts, and the jury gave mathematical results which would lead one to believe that they were found by a “struck jury” of accountants.
Since the case was argued in this court we have spent many days in reviewing the testimony. W e would have been aided by specifications of alleged errors of a different character than those contained in the statement on motion…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Boyce's Executors v. GrundySupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hadden v. SpaderCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1822
- Beck v. BurdettNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
- Loos v. . WilkinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State ex rel. Whiteside v. First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Wallace v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Towe Antique Ford Foundation v. Internal Revenue Service, Department of Treasury, United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1992
- Nelson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
- Cobban v. HecklenMontana Supreme Court · 1902
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.