Legal Opinion

Roman v. Albert

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1928No. 6,232PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On July 31, 1926, the plaintiff, Liberty Roman, commenced action in the district court of Carbon county for the reformation of a certain deed and to quiet title to the real estate described in it and two other deeds; she named as defendants Steve Roman, her husband, John Albert, sheriff of the county, and Sadie Mae Puutio. Roman defaulted and thereafter appeared in the case only as a witness for the plaintiff.

Albert and Puutio joined issue as to the facts alleged in the complaint, and the latter filed a cross-complaint in which she attacked the deeds as fraudulent and set up a lien on the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Casey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Merchants' National Bank v. GreenhoodMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Daniels v. Granite Bi-Metallic Con. Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Clary v. FlemingMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Warren v. SenecalMontana Supreme Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Emery v. EmeryMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Montana National Bank v. MichelsMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hayward v. Richardson Construction CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Humbird v. ArnetMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. McLaughlin v. CorcoranMontana Supreme Court · 1937

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API