Legal Opinion

Poole v. Olaveson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1960No. 8894PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Appellants (plaintiffs) seek to enjoin respondents (defendants) from diverting their waste water arising from the irrigation of their lands into drainage ditch or system-constructed by appellants, who contend it to be their own private property; whereas respondents contend that the drainage system substitutes for the natural channel of Spring Creek, which furnished natural drainage for such waste waters.

The Sections of land hereinafter referred to are situate in Township 5 North, Range 38 East of the Boise Meridian, in Jefferson County.

Spring Creek arises in the Little Buttes…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Rigney v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  4. City of Los Angeles v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Van Camp v. EmeryIdaho Supreme Court · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Nelson v. MarshallIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Kunz v. Utah Power & Light Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Nettleton v. HigginsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API