Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Marshall
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1972No. 10729PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALDSON, Justice.
The pertinent facts giving rise to this appeal are not in dispute. On March 17, 1970, T. Stanley Nelson (plaintiff-appellant) filed a petition for a writ of prohibition to prevent the Idaho Water Resource Board from loaning money to Arves L. Christensen for the development of irrigation wells to be used in applying water to arid lands located near Payette, Idaho. The appellant is a taxpayer and has property rights adjoining the land under development by Mr. Christensen; his standing to sue was conceded by the respondents. The petition filed by the appellant in district…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Thompson v. HaganIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. NewmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Idaho Water Resource Board v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Boise Redevelopment Agency v. Yick Kong Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Bradshaw v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.