Legal Opinion

Nettleton v. Higginson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1977No. 11935PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice.

This controversy involves a dispute between plaintiff-appellant J. H. Nettleton, a water user located in the Upper Reynolds Creek Water District, and defendant-respondent Department of Water Resources, which assumes distribution of waters of Reynolds Creek. Reynolds Creek is a natural stream located in Owyhee County, Idaho, and the Department of Water Resources, formerly the Department of Water Administration, divided the stream into two water districts, District 57-A which is known as Upper Reynolds Creek District wherein the appellant owns property, and District 57-J…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. United States v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Crow v. CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API