Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. City of Glendale

California Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1943No. L. A. 18155; L. A. 18154PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Between bedrock and the surface soil and sand, on the floor of the San Fernando Valley, there is a layer of gravel and rocks into which most of the water reaching the floor of the valley sinks. As a result, the subsurface of the valley holds a large mass of water that fills the interstices between the rocks and flows toward the lower end of the valley, eventually rising to become part of the surface flow of the Los Angeles River. This water has four sources: (1) the waters normally present in the valley; (2) the flood waters of Pacoima Creek and Tujunga Creek, which formerly flowed violently…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Devine v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. In Re Waters of Long Valley Creek Stream SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API