Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Conway

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1973No. 2-1072A76PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Case Summary

Buchanan, P.J.

This appeal is by plaintiff-appellant Juel Pugh (Pugh) from a judgment declaring an easement in her favor upon the residential property of defendants-appellees Harold and Lucille Lawrence (Lawrence) covering a smaller area than claimed in her Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, and quieting title in Lawrence, subject to the easement declared.

We affirm.

FACTS

The facts and evidence most favorable to Lawrence as appellee(s) are:

In September of 1939, Pugh purchased the east one-half of Lot 4 in Banta’s Addition in Windfall, Indiana, the east line of which has a common…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pokraka v. Lummus Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Fankboner v. CorderIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Gadreault v. HillmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. D'Orazio Et Ux. v. PashbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Null v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. O'DELL v. StegallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Umbreit v. Chester B. Stem, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Searcy v. La GrotteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Greenco, Inc. v. MayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Pittman v. LowtherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API