Legal Opinion
Gadreault v. Hillman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 7, 1945PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.
By this bill in equity the plaintiff seeks to have the defendant permanently enjoined from crossing certain land owned by the plaintiff. Answering, the defendant alleged that he has the legal right to cross the' premises involved, that he and his predecessors in title have claimed and enjoyed that right for more than twenty years, and that said right accrued by peaceful and adverse possession, has never been abandoned or extinguished, and is a right appurtenant to the defendant’s premises. The case was referred to a master and comes before us on *657the defendant’s appeal from the interlocutory…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Dodge v. Anna Jaques HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Franz v. FranzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Kasper v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Robinson v. PeroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Ferrone v. RossiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Ryan v. StavrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Lowell Gas Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Foot v. BaumanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Tucker v. PochMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.