Legal Opinion

Fankboner v. Corder

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1891No. 14,687PublishedCited by 31 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.

This was a suit by the appellee against the appellant to restrain him from erecting a gate across the entrance to a private way, the right of which she claimed had been acquired by prescription.

The court, by request of appellant, made a special finding of the facts and stated its conclusions of law thereon. Ap*165pellant excepted to the conclusions of law and assigns error thereon.

Appellant also assigns as error the overruling of his motion for a new trial. The motion for a new trial was based solely upon the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding. We have read the evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ross v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Robinson v. ThrailkillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Palmer v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Phillips v. DresslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Murphy Chair Co. v. American Radiator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Roush v. RoushIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Foshee v. BrigmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Searcy v. La GrotteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Trimboli v. . KinkelNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API