Searcy v. La Grotte
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CASE SUMMARY
BUCHANAN, J. —
Defendants-Appellants, John and Helen Searcy (the Searcys), appeal from a judgment denying the existence of an easement over the property of Ralph LaGrotte (LaGrotte), claiming there was insufficient evidence to support the judgment.
We affirm.
FACTS
The evidence most favorable to the judgment reveals:
The contiguous parcels of land owned by the Searcys and LaGrotte were previously the property of a Mr. Martin. In 1925, Martin divided his property between two of his children giving adjacent twenty (20) acre parcels to his daughters, Christena Brandt (Brandt) and Rosa…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Ellis v. BassettIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Fankboner v. CorderIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Shandy v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
- Null v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Reed v. LuznyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- North Snow Bay, Inc. v. HamiltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Larabee v. BoothIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wilfong v. Cessna Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Popp v. HardyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.